Skip to content

Enterprise Application Patterns

This section documents architectural patterns for building enterprise applications with Apache Cassandra. These patterns address common challenges in distributed systems (reliability, consistency, scalability, and operational complexity) through proven approaches that leverage Cassandra's strengths while acknowledging its constraints.


Pattern Catalog by Category

Foundational Patterns

Core patterns applicable across domains:

Pattern Description Key Use Cases
CQRS Separates read and write models for independent optimization Regional read replicas, read-heavy workloads
Event Sourcing Stores state changes as immutable events Audit trails, temporal queries, debugging
Transactional Outbox Reliable database + message broker updates Event-driven architectures, sagas
Idempotency Safe operation retry without side effects Payment processing, message consumption
Saga Distributed transactions with compensation Multi-service operations, long-running processes

Finance & Regulated Industries

Patterns for financial services, compliance, and audit requirements:

Pattern Description Key Use Cases
Ledger Double-entry bookkeeping with balance proofs Banking, payments, accounting
Digital Currency Token systems with double-spend prevention Loyalty points, in-game currency, digital assets
Audit & Compliance Immutable audit trails, consent management GDPR, HIPAA, SOX compliance

IoT & Industrial

Patterns for device management and high-volume telemetry:

Pattern Description Key Use Cases
Digital Twin Device state management and synchronization IoT platforms, asset tracking
Telemetry at Scale High-volume ingestion and hot partition mitigation Sensor networks, fleet management
Time-Series Data Temporal bucketing and aggregation pyramids Metrics, logs, monitoring

SaaS & Platform

Patterns for multi-tenant and high-performance applications:

Pattern Description Key Use Cases
Multi-Tenant Isolation Tenant data separation and noisy neighbor prevention SaaS platforms, shared infrastructure
Speed Layer Low-latency access to hot data User accounts, sessions, real-time state

Industry Reference Guide

Financial Services

uml diagram

Recommended patterns: Ledger + Saga + Audit & Compliance + Idempotency


IoT Platform

uml diagram

Recommended patterns: Digital Twin + Telemetry at Scale + Time-Series + Multi-Tenant


Healthcare

uml diagram

Recommended patterns: Audit & Compliance + Event Sourcing + Speed Layer + Idempotency


SaaS Platform

uml diagram

Recommended patterns: Multi-Tenant + Speed Layer + CQRS + Transactional Outbox


Pattern Selection Guide

If the problem is... Consider...
Read and write scaling differ significantly CQRS
Complete audit trail required Event Sourcing, Audit & Compliance
Database + message broker must stay in sync Transactional Outbox
Retries causing data corruption Idempotency
Time-indexed data growing unbounded Time-Series Data
Multi-step operations across services Saga
Financial transactions with balance tracking Ledger
Loyalty points or token management Digital Currency
IoT device state and commands Digital Twin
High-volume sensor data Telemetry at Scale
Multiple customers on shared infrastructure Multi-Tenant Isolation
Low-latency user data access Speed Layer
Regulatory compliance (GDPR, HIPAA, SOX) Audit & Compliance

Pattern Relationships

These patterns often combine in production systems:

Pattern Combination Use Case
Event Sourcing + CQRS Events as write model, projections as read models
Event Sourcing + Outbox Publishing domain events to external systems
Ledger + Saga Multi-account financial transactions
Ledger + Audit & Compliance Regulated financial systems
Digital Twin + Telemetry IoT platform with device management
Multi-Tenant + Speed Layer SaaS with per-tenant performance
Outbox + Idempotency Reliable messaging with safe consumer retries
CQRS + Multi-Tenant Per-tenant read replicas

Complexity vs Value

Not every application needs every pattern. Apply patterns where they solve actual problems:

uml diagram

Start with the patterns that address immediate problems. Add complexity only when requirements demand it.